ため息さんは、対応出来なかった自分自身を自覚している。くりさんも知ってる。

丹羽総説イントロのBox2には、受精卵の発生経過の図が書かれていて、そこを参考に、人工的細胞であるES、TS細胞の転写因子状態を説明してます。

学とみ子は、最初から、丹羽総説では、人工的に誘導したES、TS、EpiSCの動態解析の研究を踏まえて、自然発生する受精卵分化過程を説明していると書いてます。胎盤が哺乳類の進化に重要と書いてます。対比させて書くのが、この研究領域の手法のようだと、学とみ子は書いてます。

当初、ため息ブログメンバー、特に致命的さんは、対比などどこにも書いて無い!と騒ぎましたが、結局、彼らも書いてあることを認めざるを得ませんでした。

それでも、ため息さんは強気の発言をし続けます。彼らにとって、科学を正当に理解するより、ため息ブログメンバーが科学に精通する人たちであると叫ぶ事が大事です。くりさんも、ため息さんの応援が目的です。こうした印象操作に騙される一般の人たちの確保が優先です。

こうした以下の英文のシンプル性は、彼らにとって理解が難しいようです。trophと聞くと、学とみ子はすぐ胎盤を連想しますが、ため息ブログメンバーは、はっきり胎盤と書いてないと理解できないのだと思います。彼らは、動物の細胞構成に至る過程をイメージ出来ません。どの臓器は、どのような細胞で構成され、お互いの機能をどのように協力し合うかのイメージが、彼らの頭にありません。

The in vitro differentiation system of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) (Box 1, Glossary; Box 2) provides one such model (Niwa, 2010). In this Review, I focus on studies that analyze the role of TFs in regulating mESC self-renewal and differentiation, and summarize the mechanisms involved in the functioning and transitioning of TF networks.

ため息さんは、相変わらずです。sigh
2020年10月8日 6:10 PM

>くりさんは、そのコメント内容からみると、研究の世界の住人で普通のまともな方のようです。

>当方等と同じ考えの方が新たに出てくると、学とみ子はパニックになって、「くりさんをため息陣営の人間である」とみなし、さらに「くりさんは”ESねつ造論の限界は当然、知ってい”る」と勝手に決めつけ、「くりさんが当方等の主張が”理路整然”としている」ことに不満なんですな。


>学とみ子は彼女の考えを支持している方が誰もいないという現実を理解できず、




ため息陣営は、だませる人だけをだますという方針のようです。自身が、
”理路整然”ではないことは、ため息さんはわかってます。何しろ、転写因子なるものを理解できなかったのだから。それでも、論文を読む気はなかったとの強弁です。

そもそも、ため息さんは、自身の読み方を示してないですから。学とみ子が説明した短文部分の英語の言い回しにこだわっているだけで、全体像に触れていません。

ため息ブログメンバーは、当初、転写因子なるものの機能を知らなかったのだから、丹羽総説が理解できるわけがありません。それを一番良くわかっているのは、ため息さん自身でしょう。




トランプ大統領の映像を見ると、吸気時間が短く肺胞障害がありそうです。これはさすがに気の毒です。自身を常に完璧な人にしておきたいのは、男性願望なのでしょう。

トランプ大統領に徹底抵抗のCNNでは、以下のように伝えています。
トランプ大統領は、ペロシさんのようなライバルだけでなく、自らの政権の中核となっている人たちにも批判的です。
バー司法長官などは、トランプ大統領のささえてきた人です。



It all has lent the impression of a leader and an administration in new state of disarray, even for a tenure marked by chaos. Some of Trump's aides have speculated his wild swings in temperament and head-spinning reversals are related to his medical condition, and specifically his use of dexamethasone, the steroid he had been taking as part of his treatment for coronavirus.
He's been conducting most of his business by telephone as officials avoid coming into close contact with him. Those who have taken his calls uniformly described him as "upbeat," though that has not been in evidence during his rage-filled interviews on Fox News and Fox Business, when he angrily tore into both his political rivals and the senior-most Cabinet members in his own administration.


日本語のニュ-スでは、木村太郎氏が共和党が勝つだろうとか、トランプ大統領が勝つだろうのコメントにgoodが入る傾向があるが、なぜなのだろう。

トランプ大統領の自己主張は強すぎると思うし、民主国家の国のトップはリーダーシップはいらない。
右に揺れ、左に揺れて、望ましい道をさがしてほしい。
人も国も多様でなければいけないと思う。人の免疫も、腸内細菌も多様であるから健康を保つ。

トランプ大統領は、呼吸が苦しいのを隠すような人だ。誰の言うことも聞かない様子だ。

学とみ子は単純と言われるかもしれないが、民主党の副大統領候補に女性がなったのはうれしい。
日本のメディアはあまり論評していないと思う。
民主党びいきのCNNの記事ではあるが、ハリス氏に軍配を上げているので、ここに書いておく。

米国の状況や、米語の言い回しに詳しくない日本人にとっては、勉強するには良いと思う。意味が分かりにくいところがある。

ペルドンさん、この英語にどういう評価ですか?
On Wednesday night, Harris spoke. And apparently, America listened.


Democratic California Sen. Kamala Harris' very presence on the plexiglass-partitioned stage on Wednesday night was historic: In August, she became the first Black and South Asian woman, as well as the first graduate of a historically Black college or university, to be chosen as a major party candidate's running mate.
Once again, Black Americans weren't just the backbone of the Democratic Party. They were the face of it, too. Harris served as a bookend to the first Black president in Barack Obama, who was followed by one of the country's most racially divisive presidents, Donald Trump.
But the momentousness of the night didn't obscure the pressures that Harris nimbly contended with whenever Vice President Mike Pence attempted to talk over or interrupt her or downplay her expertise. She was firm without falling into any of the traps that could associate her with labels -- emotional, angry, nasty -- reserved for women, especially Black women.
Almost predictably, Trump denigrated Harris during a rambling Fox Business interview the next morning by referring to her as a "monster" who was on stage with Pence.
Early on in the debate, as Harris rebutted the Trump administration's comic assertion that its disastrously slow response to the novel coronavirus pandemic was out of a desire to keep Americans calm, the Vice President tried to cut her off.

"Mr. Vice President, I'm speaking," Harris said. The moderator, Susan Page of USA Today, granted the senator an additional 15 seconds to talk.
"I want to ask the American people: How calm were you when you were panicked about where you were going to get your next roll of toilet paper?" Harris asked, turning her gaze directly to the camera. "How calm were you when your kids were sent home from school and you didn't know when they could go back? How calm were you when your children couldn't see your parents because you were afraid they could kill them?"

Later, Harris repeated her memorable line.
Pence claimed that Democratic nominee Joe Biden would raise taxes immediately upon assuming office. As Harris launched into her rejoinder -- "I thought we saw enough of it in last week's debate, but I think this is supposed to be a debate based on fact and truth," she said -- Pence attempted to butt in.
"Mr. Vice President, I'm speaking." Harris said, as she smiled and shook her head. "If you don't mind letting me finish, we can then have a conversation, OK?"
Pence bowed: "Please," he responded.
It was an unenviable position that Harris nonetheless nailed. She was, to borrow part of Shirley Chisholm's widely known campaign slogan, "unbossed" in a country that always finds ways to punish powerful women.
Or as the senator recently put it to Elle magazine: "That's why I've run for most offices I have run for, because I'm not so good sometimes at asking for permission."
The racial and gender dynamics were again on display when the debate turned to police brutality.
When Page asked Harris and Pence whether justice was done in the case of Breonna Taylor, who was killed during a flawed police raid in March, the Vice President stuck to the GOP script. He characterized protests for racial justice as episodes of violence and scoffed at the reality of systemic racism in a country where police disproportionately kill Black Americans.
Without irony, Pence sought to distort and dismiss racial caste to someone whose lived experiences and expertise have taught her otherwise.
"We don't have to choose between supporting law enforcement and improving public safety and supporting our African American neighbors," Pence said.
But Harris wasn't having it.
"I will not sit here and be lectured by the vice president on what it means to enforce the laws of our country," the former career prosecutor said. "I'm the only one on this stage who has personally prosecuted everything from child sexual assault to homicide."
Notably, Harris knew when to move on.
"(She) went into (the debate) aware of the various dynamics and to thread the needle on balancing being assertive and letting it go at points," a source close to the senator's campaign told CNN's Jake Tapper. "Women are judged differently. It's a needle we have to thread all the time, and of course she has been the only woman and the only Black woman in many spaces."
According to a CNN Instant Poll of registered voters who watched the debate, Harris came out on top -- 59% said that she won, while 38% thought that Pence triumphed.
On Wednesday night, Harris spoke. And apparently, America listened.

スポンサーサイト



コメント

非公開コメント